Table of contents for Assessing science understanding : a human constructivist view / edited by Joel J. Mintzes, James H. Wandersee, Joseph D. Novak.


Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog


Information from electronic data provided by the publisher. May be incomplete or contain other coding.


Counter J. Mintzes and J.H. Wandersee, Learning, Teaching, and Assessment: A Human Constructivist Perspective.
K.M. Edmondson, Assessing Science Understanding Through Concept Maps.
J.J. Mintzes and J.D. Novak, Assessing Science Understanding: The Epistemological V Diagram.
S.A. Southerland, M.U. Smith, and C.L. Cummins, "What Do You Mean by That?": Using Structured Interviews to Assess Science Understanding.
K. Hogan and J. Fisherkeller, Dialogue as Data: Assessing Students' Scientific Reasoning with Interactive Protocols.
J.H. Wandersee, Designing an Image-Based Biology Test.
E. Trowbridge and J.H. Wandersee, Observation Rubrics in Science Assessment.
M.R. Vitale and N.R. Romance, Portfolios in Science Assessment: A Knowledge-Based Model for Classroom Practice.
K.M. Fisher, SemNetR Software as an Assessment Tool.
A.B. Champagne and V.L. Kouba, Writing to Inquire: Written Products as Performance Measures.
P.M. Sadler, The Relevance of Multiple-Choice Testing in Assessing Science Understanding.
P. Tamir, National and International Assessment.
R.J. Shavelson and M.A. Ruiz-Primo, On the Psychometrics of Assessing Science Understanding.
R.G. Good, Cautionary Notes on Assessment of Understanding Science Concepts and Nature of Science.
J.J. Mintzes, J.H. Wandersee, and J.D. Novak, Epilogue: On Ways of Assessing Science Understanding.
Subject Index.

Library of Congress subject headings for this publication: