Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog.
Note: Contents data are machine generated based on pre-publication provided by the publisher. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding.
Contents Why Consider Opposing Viewpoints? Introduction <head n="1">Chapter 1: Do Animals have Rights? Chapter Preface 1) Animals Have Rights Tom Regan 2) Animals Do Not Have Rights Ilana Mercer 3) Animals Are Equal to Humans Matt Ball and Jack Norris 4) Animals Are Not Equal to Humans Josie Appleton 5) Animal Rights Activists Are Terrorists Alex Epstein 6) Animal Rights Activists Are Not Terrorists Will Potter 7) Animal Researchers Should Not Be Bullied by Animal Rights Terrorists Fiona Fox Periodical Bibliography <head n="1">Chapter 2: Is Animal Experimentation Justifiable? Chapter Preface 1) Animal Experimentation Is Ethical Adrian R. Morrison 2) Animal Experimentation Is Unethical David Thomas 3) Using Primates in Medical Experimentation Is Justifiable Scientific Steering Committee of the European Commission 4) Using Primates in Medical Experimentation Is Unjustifiable John Gray 5) The Animal Experimentation Debate Has Reached a Moral Deadlock Peter Singer 6) The Moral Deadlock Concerning Animal Experimentation Can Be Broken Patrick Bateson Periodical Bibliography <head n="1">Chapter 3: Does Animal Experimentation Aid Medical Progress? Chapter Preface 1) Animal Experimentation Is Vital to Medical Research American Physiological Society 2) Animal Experimentation Is Not Vital to Medical Research Christopher Anderegg, et al. 3) Drug Testing on Animals Is Worthless Kathy Archibald 4) Microchip Technologies Could Make Drug Testing on Animals Unnecessary David H. Freedman Periodical Bibliography <head n="1">Chapter 4: Are New Forms of Animal Experimentation Worth Pursuing? Chapter Preface 1) The Risks of Animal-to-Human Transplants Outweigh the Benefits Joyce D’Silva 2) The Benefits of Animal-to-Human Transplants Outweigh the Risks A physician, interviewed by Gale Scott 3) Genetically Modified Animals Are Beneficial to Medicine Part I: Alexandre Fouassier, Part II: Manufacturing Chemist 4) Genetically Modified Animals Are Not Beneficial to Medicine Animal Aid 5) Animal Cloning Is Worthwhile Marie A. Di Berardino 6) Animal Cloning Is Unnecessary Wayne Pacelle Periodical Bibliography For Further Discussion Organizations to Contact Bibliography of Books Index
Library of Congress Subject Headings for this publication:
Animal experimentation -- Moral and ethical aspects.
Animal experimentation -- United States.