Table of contents for What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin.

Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog.

Note: Contents data are machine generated based on pre-publication provided by the publisher. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding.


Counter
Contents
Preface 
Part I: Roe v. Wade--An Engine of Controversy 1
Jack M. Balkin 
Part II: Revised Opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton 
 Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) 46
 Reva Siegel (concurring) 103
 Mark Tushnet (concurring) 144
 Anita Allen (concurring in the judgment) 153
 Jed Rubenfeld (concurring in the judgment except as to 
 Doe)182
 Robin West (concurring in the judgment) 201
 Cass Sunstein (concurring in the judgment) 248
 Akhil Amar (concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe) 254
 Jeffrey Rosen (dissenting) 284
 Teresa Stanton Collett (dissenting) 313 
 Michael Stokes Paulsen (dissenting) 328
 Photo Appendix to the Opinion of Michael Stokes Paulsen
 370
 Comments from the contributors 371
Appendix A: The Constitution of the United States of America:
Selected Provisions 424
Roe v. Wade: A Selected Bibliography 429
About the Contributors 443
Index 000

Library of Congress Subject Headings for this publication:

Roe, Jane, 1947- -- Trials, litigation, etc.
Wade, Henry -- Trials, litigation, etc.
Abortion -- Law and legislation -- United States.
Trials (Abortion) -- United States.