Table of contents for The design revolution : answering the toughest questions about intelligent design / William A. Dembski.


Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog. Note: Contents data are machine generated based on pre-publication information provided by the publisher. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding.


Counter
Contents
Foreword by Charles Colson [byline here? include Nancy Pearcey's name?]
Preface
Acknowledgments
Part One: Basic Distinctions
1 Intelligent Design
What is intelligent design?
2 Creation
How does intelligent design differ from a theological doctrine of creation?
3 Scientific Creationism 
Is intelligent design a cleverly disguised form of scientific creationism?
4 Disguised Theology
Even though intelligent design purports to be a scientific research program, isn't it 
really a theological enterprise?
5 Religious Motivation
Isn't the real driving force behind intelligent design a fear that evolutionary theories, 
and Darwinism in particular, will one day permanently displace any need for God? 
6 Optimal Design
Why place the word intelligent in front of design? It seems that much of the design in 
nature is anything but intelligent.
7 The Design Argument
How does intelligent design differ from the design argument?
Part Two: Detecting Design
8 The Design Inference
What is the design inference? How does the design inference differ from the design 
argument?
9 Chance and Necessity
How does the scientific community conceive of natural causes, and why aren't 
intelligent causes among them?
10 Specified Complexity
What is specified complexity, and how does one determine whether something exhibits 
specified complexity?
11 The Explanatory Filter
How does specified complexity function as a criterion for detecting design?
12 Reliability of the Criterion
Is specified complexity a reliable criterion for detecting design?
13 Objectivity and Subjectivity
Does specified complexity describe an objective feature of the world or merely a 
subjective state of ignorance about the functioning of the world?
14 Assertibility
Even if specified complexity is a well-defined, objective, and reliable criterion for 
detecting design, why should we think that we could ever be justified in asserting that 
some natural object exhibits specified complexity? 
15 The Chance of the Gaps
Why must any scientific theory that aims to detect design be probabilistic?
Part Three: Information
16 Information and Matter
What is the difference between information and matter, and what role does each play in 
the theory of intelligent design?
17 Information Theory
How does the mathematical theory of information relate to intelligent design and, 
specifically, to intelligent design's criterion for detecting design, namely, specified 
complexity?
18 Biology's Information Problem
What is biology's information problem, and how do biologists attempt to resolve it?
19 Information ex Nihilo
Is nature complete in the sense of possessing all the capacities needed to bring about the 
information-rich structures that we see in the world and especially in biology? Or are 
there informational aspects of the world that nature alone cannot bridge but require the 
guidance of an intelligence?
20 Nature's Receptivity to Information
What must nature be like for a designing intelligence to interact coherently with the 
world and generate the specified complexity we see in living things?
21 The Law of Conservation of Information
What does it mean to say that specified complexity or complex specified information is 
conserved?
Part Four: Issues Arising from Naturalism
22 Varieties of Naturalism
Is naturalism in any guise compatible with intelligent design?
23 Interventionism
Is intelligent design an interventionist theory in which design events punctuate an 
otherwise fully natural causal history?
24 Miracles and Counterfactual Substitution
Does intelligent design require miracles? And, if so, wouldn't that place it outside the 
bounds of science?
25 The Supernatural
Isn't the designer to which intelligent design attributes biological complexity a 
supernatural agent and therefore outside the bounds of science?
26 Embodied and Unembodied Designers
Would the design produced by an unembodied designer be accessible to scientific 
investigation in the same way as the design produced by an embodied designer?
27 The Designer Regress
If nature exhibits design, who or what designed the designer?
28 Selective Skepticism
Why is professional skepticism so antagonistic toward intelligent design? What are 
skepticism's prospects for unseating intelligent design?
29 The Progress of Science
Does scientific progress invariably vindicate naturalism and work against intelligent 
design?
Part Five: Theoretical Challenges to Intelligent Design
30 Argument from Ignorance
In attributing design to biological systems, isn't intelligent design just arguing from 
ignorance?
31 Eliminative Induction
If the design inference isn't just an argument from ignorance, how is it more than an 
argument from ignorance?
32 Hume, Reid and Signs of Intelligence
Didn't David Hume demolish not just the design argument for the existence of God but 
also any sort of inference to design based on features of the natural world?
33 Design by Elimination Versus Design by Comparison
How are design hypotheses properly inferred-simply by eliminating chance 
hypotheses or by comparing the likelihood of chance and design hypotheses?
34 The Demand for Details: Darwinism's Tu Quoque
Isn't it the height of hypocrisy for design theorists to complain that Darwinism provides 
no details about the emergence of biological complexity when their own theory, 
intelligent design, likewise provides no such details?
35 Displacement and the No Free Lunch Principle
How do the No Free Lunch theorems undercut Darwinian theory and support 
intelligent design?
36 The Only Games in Town
Isn't it crude and simplistic to cast the debate over biological evolution as being 
between merely Darwinism and intelligent design? Surely evolutionary biology 
encourages many more options. 
Part Six: A New Kind of Science
37 Aspirations
What does science stand to gain from intelligent design, and what is intelligent design 
aspiring to do for science?
38 Mechanism
Since intelligent design is not a mechanistic theory of life's origin and development, 
how can it be scientific?
39 Testability
Is intelligent design testable? Is Darwinism testable?
40 The Significance of Michael Behe
Why do evolutionary biologists think Michael Behe's work on irreducible complexity 
has been discredited?
41 Peer Review
If intelligent design is a scientific research program, why don't design theorists publish 
or have their work cited in the peer-reviewed literature?
42 The "Wedge"
Isn't intelligent design really a political agenda masquerading as a scientific research 
program?
43 Research Themes
What's a scientist interested in intelligent design supposed to do by way of scientific 
research?
44 Making Intelligent Design a Disciplined Science
Granting that intelligent design is a scientific research program, or that it at least has the 
potential to become one, how can it avoid being swept away as part of a larger cultural 
and political agenda? 




Library of Congress Subject Headings for this publication: Intelligent design (Teleology) Miscellanea