Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog.
Note: Contents data are machine generated based on pre-publication information provided by the publisher. Contents may have variations from the printed book or be incomplete or contain other coding.
CONTENTS Preface iii Figures ix Tables xi Summary xiii Acknowledgments xxxiii Abbreviations and acronyms xxxix 1. Introduction 1 2. JTF NA and OEF Overview 10 3. Combat Support Execution Planning and Control 18 4. Forward Operating Locations and Site Preparation 33 5. Forward Support Location/CONUS Support Location Preparation for Meeting Uncertain FOL Requirements 46 6. Reliable Transportation to Meet FOL Needs 55 7. Resourcing to Meet Contingency, Rotational, and MRC Requirements 70 8. Conclusions 84 Appendix A: Combat Support Execution Planning and Control (CSC2) To-BE Operational Architecture Nodes and Responsibilities 89 Appendix B: CSC2 in the Centralized Intermediate Repair Facility test 97 Appendix C: A Framework for Assessing Support Capabilities 103 Bibliography 109 FIGURES Figure 1.1: Conceptual Global ACS Network 7 Figure 1.2: ACS Network as Implemented during JTF NA and OEF 8 Figure 2.1: Size and Scope Comparison of JTF NA and OEF 11 Figure 2.2: Combat Support Requirements During the First 100 Days of OEF 14 Figure 3.1: JTF NA Operational and CSC2 Timeline 18 Figure 3.2: CSC2 Organizational Structure Implemented During JTF NA 20 Figure 3.3: CSC2 Organizational Structure Implemented During OEF 22 Figure 3.4: OEF Operational and CSC2 Timeline 23 Figure 3.5: USAFE OEF COMAFFOR Command Relationships 26 Figure 4.1: FOL Development in JTF NA 34 Figure 4.2: FOL Development Timelines Varied in OEF 35 Figure 4.3: Creature Comforts Suffered at Some FOLs to Meet Operational Requirements 40 Figure 5.1: JTF NA and OEF FOL Footprint 47 Figure 5.2: OEF Combat Support Requirements 48 Figure 5.3: Combat Support Requirements Were Resourced Mainly From FSLs During OEF 49 Figure 5.4: CIRFs Provided Maintenance Support for Fighters During OEF 52 Figure 5.5: CIRFs Reduced the southwest Asia/AOR Footprint 53 Figure 6.1: OEF Commodity Movement 56 Figure 6.2: Commodities Other Than Fuel Moved in Support of OEF 56 Figure 6.3: Modes of Transportation Used to Move Combat Support Materiel During OEF 57 Figure 6.4: Air Transportation of Spares, No One System is Best in All Cases 62 Figure 6.5: Materiel Sat at Transshipment Hubs During OEF Because the Strategic and Theater Systems Were Not Well Coordinated 67 Figure 7.1: OEF HF Employment Practices Differ from Planning Practices 73 Figure 7.2: Use of PGMs During JTF NA and OEF 76 Figure 7.3: AEF Rotational Cycle Extensions as of November 2002 78 Figure 7.4: Demand for Fuels Personnel Was Double Those Available in the AEF Bucket 80 Figure B.1: The Closed-Loop Process Used to Control Fighter CIRF Operations in OEF 98 Figure B.2: Combat Support Performance Parameters Were Related to Operational MOEs 99 Figure B.3: Actual Process Performance & Resource Levels Were Compared with Planned Values 101 Figure C.1: Model of AEF Capabilities and Options Analysis 104 Figure C.2: Notional Equipment Capabilities and Constraints Model 105 Figure C.3: Notional Manpower Capabilities and Constraints Model 106 Figure C.4: Notional Model of the Integration of Equipment and Manpower Capabilities of AEF Buckets 107 Figure C.5: Fuels Capability During the Steady-State Is Limited 108 TABLES Table S.1: Dimensions of Support in JTF NA and OEF xvi Table S.2: Assessing Combat Service Support xxvii Table 4.1: Contractor Support Surged During OEF 43 Table 7.1: Harvest Falcon Planning Factors vs. Actual Usage Today 72 Table 7.2: Munitions Employment vs. Planning Factors 75 Table 8.1: Assessing Combat Service Support 84 Table A-1: TO-BE CSC2 Nodes and Responsibilities 90
Library of Congress Subject Headings for this publication: