Bibliographic record and links to related information available from the Library of Congress catalog
Copyrighted sample text provided by the publisher and used with permission. May be incomplete or contain other coding.
Introduction
For anyone who writes -- a journalist, an author, a public-relations specialist or just someone who is writing a formal letter -- a style guide is a valuable beacon. For anyone who wants to write in an authoritative business style, The Wall Street Journal's stylebook sheds even more light. This guide, an updated and expanded version of the one long used by Journal reporters and editors, provides answers to everyday questions the computer's spelling checker won't resolve: Are the accepted forms businessman, businesswoman and businesspeople? Or is it businesspersons? Or is a hyphen involved? What about a person running a small business? Is he or she a small-businessperson or what?
With more than 3,875 alphabetized entries, this guide not only explains such broad concepts as the difference between the New Economy and the Old but also defines everything from blue-chip stocks to junk bonds. Confused about intraday and interday highs and lows in the market? Wondering about business and financial terms from Ebitda and Ebita earnings to zero-coupon bonds? It provides the answers.
The Web world's explosion of tech terms also is given due diligence, from Alpha testing to twisted pair and vortal. But perhaps the primary asset is the book's basic guidance to proper usage of the language in general. Do you confuse fortuitous and fortunate? Flounder and founder? Have you used enervate when you meant energize? Help is at hand.
Stylebooks, a relatively recent journalistic phenomenon, have become invaluable tools for maintaining standards and promoting consistency of usage. The Wall Street Journal, founded in 1889 by Charlie Dow, Eddie Jones and Charles Bergstresser, somehow survived its first 60 years without a stylebook. In fact, the Journal long prided itself on the stylistic freedom of expression it provided its writers and editors without onerous constraints: "Our newsmen are not bound by formulas or patterns," a top editor wrote in 1967, a time when indeed there were very few newswomen at the Journal. "They are encouraged to be imaginative, flexible and different. The Wall Street Journal has no stylebook." The lack of a stylebook encouraged imagination, perhaps. Without doubt, it encouraged difference -- and inconsistency.
Newspaper stylebooks in general were extremely rudimentary for the most part until about 1977, when the Associated Press issued the forerunner of many of today's comprehensive stylebooks. The Journal's earliest attempt at codifying rules for writers and editors was a 1952 guide on spelling, capitalization and use of figures and abbreviations that ran 14 small pages. An entry opposing the use of all-time record noted, without apologies to Gertrude Stein, that "a record is a record is a record."
The 1952 guide had this apologetic introduction: "The suggestions outlined here are not intended as a complete style manual for the Journal. They originated as an attempt to compile pointers which a newcomer to any one of our copy desks might find useful. Actually, as we attempted to set down our editing practices in a logical way, some appeared to be rather illogical -- so our veteran editors will note that certain changes in past style are contained herein...When the time seems ripe, a fresh edition of the style guide will be run off."
The time apparently didn't ripen quickly, but in 1961, a new 10-page guide for Journal staff members covered little more than capitalization and punctuation rules and then declared sweepingly that "common sense is the best guide in matters not covered by the guide." Common sense is indeed often a good guide to style decisions. The problem is that common sense is quite uncommon, and what one editor may postulate as common sense another may consider to be common rubbish. Meanwhile, with everyone employing a different common sense, arcane and archaic usages creep in, and inconsistencies storm in.
Some quirky Journal customs were passed along orally (as distinct from verbally) for years from copy editor to copy editor, and few even remembered their origins. A 16-page booklet for the news staff in 1970 provided a list of banned words, for example, that included buck, shift, shut and shot. Why? "The reasons should be obvious," the guide said, cryptically. In fact, the ban reflected editors' fears that inept or capricious typesetters would turn these innocent words into embarrassing ones. Thus, for many years, a factory had three work turns rather than three shifts, until word-processing systems replaced human typesetters.
As the Journal expanded through the 1970s, the need for a more comprehensive guide became apparent, especially to help train new reporters and copy editors. The prototype for this book was published in 1981, then as now using the latest Webster's New World College Dictionary as its reference. Updated editions of the stylebook appeared in 1987, 1992 and 1995, with the guidance and encouragement of Managing Editor Paul E. Steiger. Subsequently, with no one questioning the need for consistent style rules any longer, the Dow Jones Newswires, under the leadership of Richard J. Levine, also published style-guide editions in 1996 and 1999, and we gratefully acknowledge those editions' contributions to this volume.
Like the earlier Wall Street Journal Stylebook editions, this one reflects the collective wisdom of scores of Journal editors and writers, whose contributions are also gratefully acknowledged.
Copyright © 2002 by Dow Jones & Company, Inc.